Feminists once again ousting themselves as being the real sex crazed perverts that seemingly perceive everything as being sexualized to shut down depictions of women that aren’t ugly orc-ish slobs.

A Japanese taxicab company, Mie Kotsu Co, also known as “Sanco” have become the unexpected targets of threats and angry messages from outraged feminists on social media due to the design of their newly introduced female character company mascot.

To commemorate the company’s 80th anniversary, two company mascots, one male and one female were introduced. The designs of these mascots were shared on social media, and people were encouraged to suggest names for both mascots through the company’s official website.

However, similar to how feminists in Japan threw a tantrum over how the Red Cross were “sexualizing children” through a collaboration with Uzaki-chan Wants to Hang Out! for blood donation campaigns, they are once again stirring controversy.

This time, they are criticizing the female Sanco mascot, claiming it is “oversexualized” and “pornographic,” showcasing once more why they aren’t fighting for equality but rather they are an invasive cancer amongst society.

Japanese feminists are out in full force slandering Mie Kotsu Company for their “sexualized” depictions of a fully clothed woman.

“Imagine if, when you went abroad, you saw posters like this all over the city. Picture a woman acting like a child, not striking the same pose as a man, but instead doing a peace sign, hopping on one foot, and wriggling around. If someone told you that this was their official character, what would you think?”

Yet another feminist criticizes the character design of the female mascot, labeling it as pornographic. This criticism aligns with the perception that these self-proclaimed “progressives” have a tendency to view attractive women in a sexualized manner, thereby projecting their own desires onto others.

They then turn around and accuse others of being perverts, advocating for women to be more “modest” and, in their view, less attractive (similar to themselves).

Despite garnering a lot of positive fanfare for the tweet, no doubt this feminist in particular deservedly got flak for their severe mental retardation by getting ratio’d in the replies and quote retweets.

It’s staggering to me how these individuals seemingly jumped over the whole “oversexualized” hurdle and outright proclaimed the design to be pornographic, a depiction of a woman wearing a suit and trousers is now porn according to these nutjobs.

They don’t consider how absurd they themselves sound, rather they just aim to attach the most damaging label they believe will affect you. If you’re someone who finds porn derogative, they’ll use that term to elicit a reaction in their favor.

It’s akin to throwing around terms like “Nazi”, “Fascist”, “Phobe” or “Ist” to manipulate the conversation.

“Is it that people who conceive characters like this can only draw them based on the creepy gender stereotypes that exist in the minds of geeky men who fantasize about women, such as unnatural wriggling postures compared to male characters, outfits that excessively emphasize curves, bow-legged stances, and a foolish demeanor of female characters?”

“Is anyone aware that bus drivers are in short supply, and we need to actively recruit female drivers? Instead of investing valuable funds in repugnant gender-discriminatory PR, are they aware that it’s nothing but a foolish act of self-destruction?”

However, according to these views, women who don’t conform to a repulsive appearance, are not overweight, aren’t perceived as obnoxious, or don’t fit into certain stereotypes and still strive to be likable are labeled as pornographic, offensive and derogatory towards “women”.

“I wish they would stop making only women have tiny waists, wiggling around for no reason, and unnecessarily plastering on smiles. And of course, the women are always portrayed as younger. It’s disgusting. Leave those outdated values in the Showa era.”

This simply proves that their concern isn’t about “objectification” or “sexual exploitation”, rather it’s about their jealousy towards attractive (non-fat) women who are pleasant and nice.

They immediately feel threatened and try to suppress it. They view beauty as forbidden and consider it unacceptable for a woman to be friendly towards men.

Instead of striving to better themselves, they choose to shut down any competition and slander everything as sexualization and now pornographic.

“When I contacted Mie Kotsu about the issue of only female characters being depicted in a wriggling manner (among other aspects), I received a response that completely failed to grasp the issue at hand.

Mie Kotsu’s response, stating that the intention of the creator and whether it’s disrespectful or not are irrelevant, is also a major problem.”

Certain feminists were so incensed that they resorted to mass-emailing their grievances to the Mie Kotsu group. However, when confronted by the public, they promptly made their profiles private.

Throughout the whole tirade I’ve yet to see one single feminist complain about the male mascot being sexualized. We’ve reached a point where feminists will screech about a female character design as being “pornographic,” even if the character in question is fully clothed and is of a petite figure.

Solely because she isn’t depicted as unattractive as they themselves are, and yet despite barely any noticeable cleavage the design it still somehow sexual and derogatory.

This is the consequence of decades of relentless demonization of heterosexual male sexuality by media outlets globally, feminists are not real humans, rather they are an invasive cancer amongst society, infecting it with their subversive delusions.

I will not shed a tear as they die alone and unloved, destined to go extinct as cat ladies.